Global Cooling Is The New Global Warming

Via Greenie Watch:

The justifiable alarmism will be about shortages in both global food supplies and global energy supply. The food supply will be reduced because of the shortened growing seasons in the “temperate food supplying regions” of the world resulting from this global cooling. This reduction in food supply will only exacerbate the current global food crisis caused by Kyoto “carbon credit initiatives” that have turned “food crops” into “biofuel crops” with the resultant widespread starvation of the poorest people in the poorest nations.

The potential energy shortages will result from the increased energy demand dictated by the cooler temperatures. This shortage will be far more severe than it should be because of the costly, inefficient, and limited solar and wind power initiatives and the virtual stagnation in expansion of efficient and high volume energy producing facilities for the past decade that have resulted from The Kyoto Protocol initiatives and exorbitant “Carbon Capture and Sequestration” (CCS) requirements that have made expansion of fossil fuel power production facilities economically unfeasible.

The global data demonstrates that there was only 23 years, from 1975 to 1998, during which there was actual global warming concurrent with rapid increases in CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. Prior to that, the world cooled from 1942 to 1795 with increasing CO2 emissions that went from 4gt/year in 1942 to over 20gt/year by 1975. During the rapid global warming that preceded this cooling period, there was only a minor increase from 3.5gt/year at the start of the warming in 1910, to 4gt/year by 1942 when the warming ended.

It’s like the 70′s all over again. Remember the TV Show In Search Of… hosted by Leonard Nimoy?

YouTube Preview Image

Obama Science Czar John Holdren Supports Fraudulent Climate Data

****a post I rescued from the great Google cache *****

Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren, the man who believes in mass sterilization to “save the planet” and that trees should have legal standing, again to “save the planet” is fighting back and supports the fraudulent climate data used in the ClimateGate e-mail scandal:

“The e-mails do nothing to undermine the very strong scientific consensus … that tells us the earth is warming, that warming is largely a result of human activity,”

Never mind that the e-mails discuss deleting data and records. Never mind that scientist in New Zealand  ‘adjusted’ data to get the desired results (showing ‘global warming’ where none exists). Never mind that NASA is stonewalling a FOIA request regarding their ‘global warming’ data:

Mark Hess, public affairs director for the Goddard Space Flight Center which runs the GISS laboratory, said they are working on Mr. Horner’s request, though he couldn’t say why they have taken so long.

“We’re collecting the information and will respond with all the responsive relevant information to all of his requests,” Mr. Hess said. “It’s just a process you have to go through where you have to collect data that’s responsive.”

He said he was unfamiliar with the British controversy and couldn’t say whether NASA was susceptible to the same challenges to its data. The White House has dismissed the British e-mails as irrelevant.

The data in question is where NASA ‘recalculated’ data to show that 1998 and 2006 and not 1934 were the warmest years  on record for the United States.

Getting Back To Obama’s Science Czar, John Holdren, he is fighting back because he is tied to the ClimateGate scandal as well. He testified earlier this week that the there is no dispute, planet is warming:

Into the mix comes White House science adviser John Holdren, whose apocalyptic and bizarre views of humanity and science should disqualify him from participation in any serious discussion. He testified Wednesday before the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming that human activity is “beyond any reasonable doubt” the primary cause of global warming.

And the author of the IBD article adds this:

However this controversy comes out,” he said of the CRU scandal, “the result will not call into question the bulk of our understanding of how the climate works or how humans affect it.” Even if that understanding is based on fudged and deliberately manipulated data designed to “hide the decline” in global temperatures?

Obama, Holdren and the rest of the anti-freedom Democrats think that we should destroy our economy and surrender our freedom based on manipulated data because, you know, all the scientists agree that there is global warming.

No ‘global warming’ or ‘climate change’ here in the last 60 years

Obama Science Czar John P. Holdren: “Trees Have Legal Rights”

****a post I rescued from the great Google cache *****

Where did Obama find this guy? Via CNSNews.com:

Since the 1970s, some radical environmentalists have argued that trees have legal rights and should be allowed to go to court to protect those rights.

The idea has been endorsed by John P. Holdren, the man who now advises President Barack Obama on science and technology issues.

Giving “natural objects” — like trees — standing to sue in a court of law would have a “most salubrious” effect on the environment, Holdren wrote  the 1970s.

“One change in (legal) notions that would have a most salubrious effect on the quality of the environment has been proposed by law professor Christopher D. Stone in his celebrated monograph, ‘Should Trees Have Standing?’” Holdren said in a 1977 book that he co-wrote with Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich.

most salubrious*.…..What a pompous egg-head.

*I’ll admit it.  I had to look up the word ’salubrious’.  And no, I don’t plan on working it in to my daily vocabulary.