****a post I rescued from the great Google cache *****
Where did Obama find this guy? Via CNSNews.com:
Since the 1970s, some radical environmentalists have argued that trees have legal rights and should be allowed to go to court to protect those rights.
The idea has been endorsed by John P. Holdren, the man who now advises President Barack Obama on science and technology issues.
Giving “natural objects” — like trees — standing to sue in a court of law would have a “most salubrious” effect on the environment, Holdren wrote the 1970s.
“One change in (legal) notions that would have a most salubrious effect on the quality of the environment has been proposed by law professor Christopher D. Stone in his celebrated monograph, ‘Should Trees Have Standing?’” Holdren said in a 1977 book that he co-wrote with Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich.
most salubrious*.…..What a pompous egg-head.
*I’ll admit it. I had to look up the word ’salubrious’. And no, I don’t plan on working it in to my daily vocabulary.

It’s posts like this that probably have placed you on Technorati’s “green” list.
“salubrious” lol. What a sophist.
The Technorati “green” list is most salubrious…