Note To Journalists: This Is Why We Have The Second Amendment

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Bill of Rights: Amendment II

I wonder if American reporters are appreciating their right to bear arms a little more these days after reading the accounts of recent, systematic attacks on Journalist by Egyptian officials. Via Committee to Protect Journalists:

In the past 24 hours alone, CPJ has recorded 30 detentions, 26 assaults, and eight instances of equipment having been seized. In addition, plainclothes and uniformed agents reportedly entered at least two hotels used by international journalists to confiscate press equipment. On Wednesday, CPJ documented numerous earlier assaults, detentions, and confiscations. Mubarak forces have attacked the very breadth of global journalism: Their targets have included Egyptians and other Arab journalists, Russian and U.S. reporters, Europeans and South Americans.

As the founding fathers understood, an armed citizenry is necessary for liberty and freedom to exist. If not, things like this happen:

Three Romanian TV crews were detained Wednesday and Thursday in Cairo, according to Antena 3 producer Vlad Petreanu, who e-mailed CPJ with details. On Wednesday, Adelin Petrisor, a reporter for the state-owned broadcaster TVR, and an unnamed cameraman were detained by Cairo police, searched, and later released. On Thursday, police detained Realitatea TV reporter Cristian Zarescu and his unidentified cameraman. Authorities confiscated their tapes before releasing them. Also on Thursday, Antena 3 reporter Carmen Avram and cameraman Cristian Tamas, were stopped by police. The men sent a text message late today saying they were being held for questioning.

As Jay G. from MArooned points out, liberal journalists who typically rail against gun rights are finding out why the Second Amendment is so important.

It’s not about hunting. The Second Amendment has never been about hunting. Hell, even self-defense against goblins is a secondary consideration. The Second Amendment is about arming the people so that the government does not start rounding folks up – be they journalists, dissidents, or left-handed square dance callers. It’s about giving the people – we, the people – the tools to resist tyranny in its many forms. It’s not about putting venison (tasty, tasty venison) in freezers, or “sporting” reasons – it’s about the very grim, serious, real task of keeping the standing army at bay through widespread personal arms. We might not have the tanks, but there are sufficient hunters, handgunners, and other 2A enthusiasts to resist should the unthinkable happen.

Even something as seemingly innocuous as rounding up journalists “for their own protection”.

How’s That Green Energy Working?

Achieving these ambitious goals will also lessen the need for a slew of new coal power plants in Michigan. That’s why I have directed the Department of Environmental Quality to evaluate, in consultation with our Public Service Commission, both the need for additional electricity generation and all feasible and prudent alternatives before approving new coal-fired power plants in Michigan. One such alternative is developing technology to prevent coal plants from spewing dirty carbon emissions into the air. That breakthrough technology, and others like it, can create jobs here, too.

The nation is moving to a new energy future, but if we are willing to think strategically and act boldly, like we have in other sectors, Michigan can lead job creation in this area too. While this new energy sector represents our single best hope for new investment and new jobs, Michigan’s diversification strategy has also targeted other emerging sectors from the life sciences to advanced manufacturing to homeland security. And we have similar results in those sectors.

Former Governor of Michigan, Democrat Jennifer Granholm- State of the State Address, February 3rd, 2009

The recent blast of arctic weather received across most of the United States has illustrated the need for reliable energy. (Where is that global warming when you need it?)

When the massive snow storm and single digit temperatures slammed El Paso, TX the cold temps created rolling blackouts across much of Texas. Local electric plants literally froze creating a dangerous situation for residents trapped in the freezing cold. Furthermore, without electricity, natural gas pumping stations could not run and shortages of natural gas in New Mexico and elsewhere ensued.

Strangely, no stories recounting how solar panels and windmills ‘picking up the slack’ from the old, dirty coal plants have surfaced. No stories about windmills keeping the lights on and natural gas flowing.

Truth be told, windmills are much more susceptible to freezing temperatures than coal power plants. Via Bluegrass Pundit:

In a pathetic attempt to implement ‘green energy’ in Minnesota, wind turbines transplanted from California have not worked since they were installed last fall. They have been paralyzed by the cold weather. Just think of all the ‘green jobs’ that will be created trying to get them to work in the frigid northern climate.

Obviously, solar panels will not work with large amounts of snow covering them. Come to think of it, green energy doesn’t work when the weather is good either.

So the wind turbines are still and silent. The hydro turbines in the rivers and dams are quiet. And toasted teacakes and hot tea are off the menu at the Eigg Tearooms.

So what on earth’s going on? Have the Eigg eco-innovators been victims of some act of jealous vandalism? Has their award- winning electricity system blown a fuse?

Er, no. It turns out that when the good people of Eigg put their faith in strong winds and pounding rain to provide all their electricity needs, they overlooked one possibility – a spell of lovely weather.

Let’s recap. Green energy doesn’t work when the weather is bad and it doesn’t work when the weather is nice.

Perfect.

Of course our leaders are completely invested in green energy and are showing no signs of backing down. Worse yet, there is no shortage of companies willing to feed at the government trough.

This is all to be expected, remember what Obama said before the 2008 election?

“Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” Obama told the Chronicle . “Coal-powered plants, you know, natural gas, you name it, whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”

To close things out, William Teach @ The Cove had this to say:

Well, his administration, along with Democrats in Congress and in State governments, have worked hard to destroy our energy infrastructure. In fact, a major source of energy, coal fired plants, have been abandoned in large numbers since 2001. No new plants have been started in the last two years. Good thing we have solar, wind, and hydrothermal, with the panels covered with snow, turbines frozen solid, and waterways frozen. On the bright side, more people will freeze to death, meaning less people on the planet, something the extreme envirowackos/climate alarmists should be pleased over.

‘Nuff said.

Making Things Up As You Go: Study Says Political Party Is Written on Your Face

Whoever paid for this nonsense needs to get their money back.

The result? They found that the students’ guesses were much better than chance. They also found that the students were good at guessing the political party affiliation of other students based on pictures of their faces.

The subtle clue the students used to make their guesses? Republicans’ faces tended to score higher on a measure of “power,” based on how dominant and mature they looked. Democrats’ faces scored higher for “warmth,” as based on their perceived likeability and trustworthiness.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t immediately think “warmth,” likability or trustworthiness when I look at this picture of a prominent Democrat:

*Note to Martin @ WWTFT: No Obama Picture.

Saturday Morning Quick Hits: Kicking Off Reagan’s 100th Birthday Celebration

In honor of President Ronald Reagan’s Centennial Birthday weekend, a clip of Reagan debating Jimmy Carter:

YouTube Preview Image

Cynical Synapse has an excellent post discussing the Fort Hood Massacre

Bringing Dictatorship Home

The Great Health Care Bluff

YouTube Preview Image

BHO’s Chickens … Coming Home To Roost!

Dick Morris: REPUBLICANS POISED TO WIN SENATE

I know we predicted Republican Senate control in 2010. Republicans did gain seven seats and came within four of winning control. Razor thin defeats in Colorado and Washington and unexpected thrashings in Nevada and West Virginia proved us wrong.

But this time – honest – we are going to win!

The battlegrounds in 2012 are a lot more red and less blue than in 2010. If we switch seats in North Dakota, Florida, Nebraska, Virginia, and Montana – red states all – we get control by 52-48.

And the way 2012 is shaping up, Republican control is more and more likely.

I sure hope dick Morris is correct.

FCBZ: Egypt, Obama, & The Muslim Brotherhood: Undermining Mubarak May Hasten Muslim Power & Middle East Catastrophe

Moving On: When it’s Time to let a Liberal go

YouTube Preview Image

So, in light of all the things I say and do wrong, I offer up this heartfelt apology that any liberal could love – I’m sorry. There, doesn’t that make it all better?

What Legacy Will Obama’s Egyptian Response Leave?

Spoiled Milk and Bad Gas: Something Stinks

How to dive your car AND save the ENTIRE PLANET at the same time.

Instead of accelerating quickly and slamming on the brakes, gain speed slowly and look ahead to anticipate when you can take your foot off the gas and begin stopping.

Wow, I’m sure no one has ever though of that before.

YouTube Preview Image

Fleece: US Senate Passes Measure To Repeal Tax-Reporting Requirement

Robot: ‘All Palin February’ Joined by Dana Milbank!

That Mr. G. Guy’s celebrates his brother’s b-day with a couple great music vid’s

And, to close out the MCT Reagan post, Pundette has a great(per usual) round up of Reagan links.

All Sarah Palin February: Palin explains why she won’t attend CPAC


Shamelessly lifted from Texas for Sarah Palin:

With speculation in the lamestram media alread rising to a fever pitch over Sarah Palin’s decision not to attend C-SPAN, the governor emailed The Washington Post blog the Fix Thursday with an official explanation:

“February is our busiest winter month and with all the prior obligations and outside travel already scheduled for the month I had to forgo some of the opportunities in the Lower 48.”

It was indeed a scheduling issue, not a personal one or any other reason, as CPAC’s David Keene had said:

“We’re disappointed that she couldn’t make it year. It’s due to a scheduling issue. We look forward to having her next year, and she expressed interest in wanting to be there this year.”

Not that she even needs CPAC anyway, as even The Fix’s Rachel Weiner has to admit:

“…unlike some other potential nominees, Palin doesn’t need to raise her profile. She can draw press wherever she goes.”

[...]

“Even in her absence, however, Palin will have a significant influence. She is, as we have written, the prime mover in the presidential race and until she makes clear whether or not she will run in 2012, she will be a presence at any gathering of would-be presidential aspirants — whether she is actually in attendance or not.”

A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words: Shanghai’s Free Market Growth


Shanghai 1990 and 2010

The growth of Shanghai has been remarkable and is due to free market policies.

Via ASI:

The “before” picture of Shanghai (from 1990) is actually the same skyline from before the Second World War. Under communism, from 1949 until 1980s-1990s, this picture of Shanghai had not changed.

And, by the way, how did Shanghai come to have such a “Western”-style skyline before the Second World War? Because following the British-Chinese War of 1842 (the “Opium War”), Shanghai was one of the treaty ports in which there emerged foreign “concessions” administered by Western governments to minimize frictions between the Chinese and Europeans and Americans, due to conflicting conceptions of criminal and civil law, and property rights.

Because of the concessions, a type of “hands off” western style of limited governance (a 19th century type of governance) took root in Shanghai. Much like what happened during Hong Kong’s rapid economic growth.

The International Settlement was administered by a city council of 14 members elected by the foreign rate payers (mostly property taxes) residing in the boundaries of the Settlement. Thus, it was, for all intents and purposes, a self-governing “city-state” under the protection of the Western Powers (which ended up meaning mostly a British and American military presence).

It thrived because it was, for the most part, a laissez-faire-run free city. Other than the municipal works, the dredging of the Whangpoo River up to where it runs into the Yangtze River, and police and fire departments, the International Settlement government basically left “the market” and the residents pretty much alone.

It was this free market environment that created that Western-style skyline that in the 1930s was considered the Asian rival of New York.

Because of the economic freedoms and wester style property and human rights, Shanghai became a beacon for immigrants and refugees.

Finally, throughout the second half of the 19th century and up until the 1941, Shanghai’s International Settlement and French Concession were a refuge for many Chinese when revolutions, civil wars, or the general cruelty of Chinese government governors or war lords made life “nasty, brutish, and short.”

There in Shanghai, financial savings were safe in Western banks, and property rights were respected and protected from both illegal plunder and the “legal” plunder of Chinese officials and war lords.

But, in addition, Shanghai’s International Settlement was a cultural oasis for Chinese artists and intellectuals. Here was born the Chinese motion picture industry; non-traditional music and art; and a haven for freedom of speech and the press, that was not allowed in surrounding Chinese administered areas. Here civil liberties were respected and secure.

It was also a property rights-safe place for the development of Chinese-owned manufacturing and industry — not only Western businesses. In Shanghai, these Chinese entrepreneurs were free from the “squeeze,” the Chinese term for bribes and corrupt protection rackets and government official shakedowns.

Like everywhere, in an imperfect world with imperfect people, Shanghai was no “utopia.” But its instituting and general protecting of Western civil and economic liberty, made the International Settlement a place of practical, everyday freedom in that part of the world.

Freedom and free markets work every time.

Stray Cats: Summertime Blues

In honor of the global warming happening across the US this week.

YouTube Preview Image

Obama Ignores Judicial Ruling… Again

Much like the U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman ruling against Obama’s off shore drilling ‘moratorium’ that Obama blatantly ignored. Our Community Organizer in Chief is once again ignoring a Federal Judges ruling because he ‘disagrees.’

The decision issued on Monday is one district court decision, and we believe it to be very wrong. The Department of Justice has made clear that it is reviewing all of its options in responding to this case, as it does in all cases. Implementation will continue.

They don’t care. “Implementation will continue.”

Even though the entire ObamaCare law has been found unconstitutional. Obama and his cronies are hanging their argument on the fact that other judges agree with him.

However, this doesn’t matter. It takes only one Federal Judge, ruling on one particular case finding a law unconstitutional to put a stop to that law.

Via Rush Limbaugh:

I don’t care what you hear in public, behind the scenes the Democrats are worried stiff about this ruling and the notion that the whole thing is unconstitutional. Now, one of things that I said earlier this week is that this could lead to a giant constitutional crisis. And last night — I didn’t see it myself, somebody sent it to me — last night on Mediaite they wrote about that as though I’m some kind of a kook, which is fine, but they think the whole idea that the Constitution might be in crisis here is silly. Why would that be? Why would it be silly to say that? We have a federal judge who has ruled a major piece of legislation unconstitutional, and the regime is basically saying, “Ah, well, it’s gonna go to Supreme Court anyway, so to hell with it.” But he has voided it. It is not the law of the land and if they continue implementing it as though it is, they are in contempt. They’re basically looking at the Constitution and winking at it or spitting on it or turning their backs on it, constitutional crisis.

Now, go ahead and make fun of pointing that out if you wish, but I hold here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers a story I printed out from CNBC.com. “Is The Obama Administration Throwing Us Into a Constitutional Crisis Over Health Care?” Let’s see if the Mediaite people go after this guy. It’s by John Carney, the senior editor at CNBC.com. “Are we experiencing a quiet constitutional crisis?” And I’ll add another question. Not only are we experiencing a quiet constitutional crisis, is it being done with thoughtful malice? Do you think the Democrats and Obama didn’t know that this was unconstitutional? They knew they were gonna have to argue this and they prepared arguments. They knew the commerce clause did not permit this. They did it anyway.

“It’s well known that Judge Roger Vinson ruled yesterday that the individual mandate exceeded the powers of the federal government under the Commerce Clause. But he also ruled that because the law lacked a severability clause and the law’s proponents had argued that the individual mandate was a necessary part of the scheme, the entire law was invalid. Wesley J. Smith explains the implications: ‘That means that under the ruling, the law is void and cannot be implemented from this point forward. The Administration’s legal remedy is to seek a stay of the ruling pending appeal. It cannot just defy a federal court ruling. If it tries, the plaintiffs should go to court for the injunction and/or seek an order of contempt against the administration,’” which I suggested yesterday one of the attorney generals of the 26 states suing the regime do.

“Pretending that the ruling doesn’t change anything when it unequivocally does, would be both a petulant and extra-legal approach to governance.

It seems Obama and his crew want to pick and chose what judges and what rulings that they will listen to.