Rush Limbaugh, Justice Clarence Thomas and what’s at stake in the 2012 Election

I happened to catch part of Rush Limbaugh’s show today where Rush was discussing the importance of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in the fight to return our government back to its Constitutional roots.

Via Rush:

“What we didn’t know, and what the world at large didn’t know until very recently, was that the New Deal constitution was not as permanent or unalterable as it looked. Intellectually its foundations were shaky, and after two decades of a Clarence Thomas-led assault, the constitutional doctrines that permitted the rise of the powerful federal government could be close to collapse.”

For the number of years that Clarence Thomas has been rendering opinions, he has been undoing the New Deal constitution doorjamb by doorjamb, taking the mansion apart if you would, to borrow a phrase from Justice Scalia, if I might. Now the story that Toobin has is essentially how Clarence Thomas and his intellectual leadership could, along with his wife and the work that she has been doing, be the intellectual force behind the repeal of Obamacare when the case gets to the Supreme Court.

Rush continues:

Number two and number ten.

Number two is basically right to bear arms. Before Clarence Thomas, the Second Amendment, everybody agreed. All it meant was that the states can have a militia. It didn’t mean individuals were empowered the right to own guns. Now after 15, 20 years of Clarence Thomas, the left has given up the gun control fight. They don’t even want to go there. Now the Tenth Amendment is next. Now, the Tenth Amendment, paraphrasing, basically says any power not specifically enumerated in the Constitution for the federal government goes to the states. Now, this is important, ladies and gentlemen, because the Commerce Clause in the Fourth Amendment has been the vehicle for the New Dealization of the US Constitution.

The Commerce Clause — and the Commerce Clause, as you know, is the route to Obamacare, forcing people to buy health insurance. The Commerce Clause is where the federal government have grown. The Commerce Clause of the Constitution is where the federal government’s grown. Now, the Clarence Thomas-and-others-led effort to take power away from the federal government and give it back to the states is amendment ten. Now, in all these Ivy League law schools and other colleges years ago, the Second Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, they were like an appendix. They were there, but they were not used. They were not necessary. Now the Tenth Amendment is being used and focused on as a way to dismantle much of federal power.

Listening to rush got me thinking about what is at stake going into the 2012 election.

If we conservatives are not successful in the 2012 election, the efforts of Justice Thomas very commendable efforts to roll back the ever encroaching federal government will be in jeopardy. Because, time is not on Justice Thomas side.

Consider that Justice Anthony Kennedy has said that he only has plans to stay on the Supreme court through Obama’s first term. After 2012, who knows what will happen. Kennedy could very well announce his retirement early 2013. If this happens and the Democrats retain their majority in the Senate in the 2012 election, we could be looking at a “moderate” being nominated to replace Kennedy, just to get a nominee through the confirmation process.

Worse, if Obama is reelected, you know he will nominate another full on liberal in the mold of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. If this happens, our nation will be in a world of hurt.

If either of these scenario play’s out in 2012; the unconstitutional ObamaCare stands a very good chance of being upheld. If this happens, there will be no limit to the reach of the federal government.

I know it’s cliché, but the 2012 election is shaping up to be a pivotal election in our nations history.

The EPA: Indoctrinating Our Children Since 1970

Remember, government in all forms, is overhead. It is an expense and adds no value (economically speaking) to our economy.

One of the most burdensome overheads of all is the EPA. They impose huge penalties for simple paperwork violations and will look high and low for a violation of some obscure regulation to use as a hammer against a business. Additionally, the EPA is in the business of indoctrinating our children to become eco-warriors. And what is worse, we are paying money for this drivel aimed at our children:

  • Choose and use a wide assortment of products made from recycled products, such as pencils made from old blue jeans; binders made from old shipping boxes; and many types of recycled paper products. You can also reuse items like refillable pens, rechargeable batteries, and scrap paper for notes. Using recycled-content and reusing supplies prevents waste and saves you money.
  • Before starting a new school year, sort through your materials. Many supplies can be reused or recycled. Notebooks, folders, and binders can be reused. Recycle unwanted papers and reuse your old folders and binders. Share your used books with friends, relatives, or younger schoolchildren.
  • Waste from packaging accounts for more than 30 percent of all the waste generated each year. Use school supplies wrapped with minimal packaging; use compact or concentrated products; or buy products that come in bulk sizes. Save packaging, colored paper, egg cartons and other items for arts and crafts projects. Look for other ways you can reduce the amount of packaging you throw away!
  • Many schools reuse text books to save money and reduce waste. Covering your textbooks with cut-up grocery or shopping bags helps reduce waste and keeps your books in good condition. Be creative—use markers or colored pencils to give your covers unique and fun designs. Paper grocery bags are also great for wrapping packages.
  • Use nontoxic products, inks and art supplies, such as batteries with less mercury, vegetable-based inks, and water-based paints.
  • Use and maintain durable products. Sturdy backpacks and notebooks can be reused for many years, which helps reduce the amount of broken items tossed away each year. Put long-lasting, high-quality tires on your car and bicycle. Be sure to keep your tires properly inflated.
  • If you bring your lunch to school, package it in reusable containers instead of disposable ones, and carry them in a reusable plastic or cloth bag, or lunch box. Bring drinks in a thermos instead of disposable bottles or cartons.
  • If you buy lunch, take and use only what you need: One napkin, one ketchup packet, one salt packet, one pepper packet, one set of flatware. And, remember to recycle your cans and bottles.
  • If you drive to school, try carpooling or take public transportation. Get your parents’ permission to try walking, biking, or skating. You can prevent wasted fuel, reduce air pollution, and decrease traffic in your community.
  • Borrow or rent your decorations and supplies for parties, dances, and proms. If you buy these supplies, try adopting a theme that can be used from year-to-year, so that you can reuse your decorations and supplies.
  • Pass it on. Share the message with your friends and schoolmates. Waste less by reducing, reusing, and recycling. Volunteer for, or start , an environmental club or recycling project in your school.
  • Work with your teachers and friends to find ways to encourage everyone in your community to make waste reduction a part of their everyday lives. You can also look for unique ways to make your school more waste-free, such as starting a school composting project.

The EPA; working overtime to create more little radical environmentalists.

Saturday Afternoon Links: The Vacation Photo Edition

I was going through more of our vacation photos from last week’s trip to Lake Michigan and here are a few more of my favorites.

click for larger version

CoF has a post that I couldn’t agree more with (and quite honestly wish I could write it as well as Jim did): Why America Should Not Support Moderate or Centrist Republicans in 2012

All governments tend towards tyranny. Governments like to govern and the nature of the beast is to want always want to govern more. They, therefore, write more and more laws and regulations that put more power in the hands of the government and less and less in the hands of governed.

Our Founders understood very well the nature of government. This is why the constitution they produced for this new experiment called The United States of America, had very specific enumerated powers for the Federal Government and all powers not enumerated were left to the states and the people. We would do well at this point to recall the famous quote of Benjamin Franklin when asked by a woman what they had done for the people, and I paraphrase here, “We have given you, madam, a republic, if you can keep it.”

Be sure to nominate you favorite liberal for the prestigious CH2.0 Useful Idiot for the month of August.

Bunkerville: Obama Justice Department Shuts Down Gibson Guitar For Breaking Indian Law 

Glenn Beck’s media problem in Israel explained

WWTFT: Excuse Me While I Save The World, by Andrew Breitbart

DBKP: A little country wisdom for Barry

click for lager version

And now some Michigan links…

TheCL: The State versus Society

CS: Just When it Seemed There Was Hope, Michigan Voters Get Stupid Again

Shane has a great point over @ TBA: Disapproval Does Not Equal Hate

MTTM: Michigan’s Congressional Representative’s Conservative Scorecard (Check out Debbie Stabanow’s score…)

Dewy: Hoping For a Hybrid? Seriously?

Conservative Perspective: Note to Self; Don’t Die in Wayne County, Michigan

I don’t think Dan Calbrese @ the Michigan View saw the humor in The BlogProf’s post and decided pick a fight with him. My money is on the Blog Prof.

click for larger image

WyBlog: So, how did President Obama’s job creation agenda fare this week?

Gator: The Marxist Morons of the Day…

TMGGB: Right Wing Bloggers Under Relentless Attack

RR: Rick Perry Confronted by Pathetic Mom Who Hides Behind Her Kid to Ask Evolution Questions.. (or the Reason #47 Why Friends Don’t Let Friends Marry Liberals – Procreation post).

Pundette: They don’t want to grow up

click for larger version

Even though the ‘Bot is down with a pulled or torn Achilles tendon (maybe he is really a Cyborg) he still pulled through with a great post: The Irrational Fear of the TEA Party

The Eye: The West Memphis Three Popular Myths v. How Our Legal System Operates

TX4P: Quotes of the day…The “Secrets” Edition

Proof: “They’re here!”

Moonbattery: Arguing With an Obama Supporter (I don’t bother, it’s pointless)

TWN: For Liberty Re-cut – Ron Paul 2012 Handout Full Video.

Radical environmentalists are fans of no growth economy

A house may be large or small; as long as the neighboring houses are likewise small, it satisfies all social requirement for a residence. But let there arise next to the little house a palace, and the little house shrinks to a hut. The little house now makes it clear that its inmate has no social position at all to maintain.

Karl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital (1847)

I’ve been seeing many variations of the “shrinking economy is really a good thing” articles of late. It seems, since the ‘green collar’ economy really isn’t panning out, the hard-core environmentalist are trying a different tack.

Via TreeHugger.com:

While some folks argue that “sustainable growth” doesn’t have to be an oxymoron, others are adamant that it is time to take the notion of a no growth economy seriously. With the dirty fingerprint of consumerism evident on the recent London riots, and even the slightest signs of economic recovery leading to record oil use, we desperately need to seek a balance between economics and community, environment and well-being.

Right…  The only dirty fingerprints evident during the London riots were those of socialism. 

The riots in London continue to shed light on the unraveling of a once-great nation. The U.K.’s Tory government has proposed to terminate the “benefits”–some of them, anyway–of those who are convicted of participating in the riots. This applies to those who are not sentenced to prison, as inmates are cared for by the state and automatically forfeit whatever benefits they may otherwise have received.

This seems like an unobjectionable plan. For one thing, all of the rioters that we saw in photos or on video appear to be perfectly able-bodied. Why are they on “benefits” in the first place? One would think that getting a job is precisely what these yobs, as the British call them, need. But in today’s England, reducing a criminal’s benefits is no easy thing

The TreeHugger continue and cite a book from Professor Tim Jackson that outlines all the supposed negative issues associated with economic growth. Issues ranging from income inequality to a rise in mental heath problems.

These findings lead our intrepid TreeHugger to this:

Tim Jackson’s prognosis for exploring a different path is unlikely to be popular among advocates for smaller government, slashed taxes, or cowboy capitalism. From shifting the balance of spending from private to public, to increasing taxation on resource use and pollution, there are plenty of examples of policies that (on this side of the pond at least) will be decried as nothing short of socialism. But shorter working weeks and more time for family, leisure and community sure sound good right now. And given that business-as-usual is in dire trouble, with few options for traditional economic fixes left, it gets increasingly hard to argue that we need an alternative path.

As pointed out previously here at MCT, economic growth has lead to increases in productivity that have created shorter, not longer, work weeks.

Our TreeHugger finishes his article with this thought:

[T]he notion that growth may no longer be good for us in the West suggests that we should further shift the focus of that plan onto non-monetary means to ensure well-being.

From tool libraries to tiny houses to connected, resilient communities, there are plenty of ways that we can recalibrate our notions of what really makes us happy, safe and in control of our lives.

After reading the above paragraph, re-read the Karl Marx quote at the open of this post.

The Gail Windpower Project in Western Michigan Project Makes No Economic Sense

I’ve been on the west side of Michigan for a little R & R for the past week While on vacation, we took a drive up US 31, between Scottsville and Crystal Lake through beautiful rolling hills, picturesque farms and blue lakes.

While driving through the countryside, I noticed giant billboards and hundreds of yard signs for and against the Gail Windpower project.

The Duke energy Gail Windpower project is a wind farm in development that will consist of 108 wind turbines each 538 feet tall. The wind farm will cover 12,000 acres (18.75 square miles) of scenic lake Michigan shoreline. Supporters of the project claim, optimistically, that the wind farm will provide power for 60,000 homes. (When the wind is blowing).

According to Duke Energy:

Duke Energy is currently developing a new commercial wind power project in Benzie and Manistee counties, Michigan. The Gail Windpower Project will consist of wind turbines capable of generating 200 megawatts of clean, renewable electricity – enough to power up to approximately 60,000 homes. The project will encompass approximately 12,000 acres of land.

Duke Energy is working closely with landowners, government officials and other stakeholder groups to make the Gail Windpower Project a reality. As is our standard practice, we are also in contact with all appropriate state, county and local agencies to thoroughly evaluate the potential impacts of construction and windpower operations.

Landowner benefits include steady income from land-lease agreements, wind turbine fees and revenue sharing. In addition, landowners can still use their property for other purposes, including farming, ranching and recreation.

Community benefits include a new source of tax revenue that the community can count on year after year, a large number of construction jobs (and a smaller number of operations jobs), and emissions-free electricity generated locally. Communities with wind energy projects also see an increase in direct and indirect economic activity, particularly during the construction phase, when hotels, restaurants, groceries, pharmacies, parts suppliers, service providers and various other vendors benefit from additional business.

The Gail Windprower project will consume 19.75 square miles of land to provide electricity for 60,000 homes. Compare the Gail Windpower project to a natural gas power plant, such as the Zeeland ‘peaker’ station that occupies a total of 30 acres. Within that 30 acres, the station generates enough electricity to power over 800,000 homes on demand. Rain or shine. Wind or no wind.

Here is a map of the project from Arcadia Wind Study Group:

Advocates for the Gail Windpower project tout the fact that the project will create jobs. Hundreds during the construction phase and 25 permanent turbine maintenance and operation jobs. Advocates also point out that the project will contribute approximately $3.2 million in annual property tax revenue. The Zeeland power station permanently employs 22 people and pays $7.6 million in property taxes to the local government.

There is no comparison between a wind farm and a traditional electric generating facility. A natural gas power-plant (or any traditional generating facility) will generate orders of magnitude more electrical power, more reliably while using a fraction of the real estate while creating the same number of jobs and contributing more to the local tax base.

Continue reading