Even China is losing Manufacturing Jobs

According to economist at ASI, mass employment in factory’s is going the way of the horse and buggy:

It’s a consitent trope from those over on the mouth breathing left, that everything would just be better if we did more manufacturing in the UK. More specifically, that if we just had more manufacturing then everyone would be employed. Which would be so nice, wouldn’t it?

The problem with this is that mass employment in manufacturing just isn’t coming back. Ever.

Manufacturing output in the UK kept going up until 2005 or so (with variations for recessions, to be sure). Manufacturing output in the US is still going up and I don’t think anyone needs to be reminded that manufacturing output in China is rising. However, rising output does not mean more jobs. Not necessarily at least.

Not only are increases in productivity curbing growth within the manufacturing sector. As pointed out last may here at MCT, manufacturing as a percentage of the US and global GDP has steadily declined over the last 40+ years.

As a result, even China has lost manufacturing jobs

Yes, China is losing manufacturing jobs. The world as a whole is losing manufacturing jobs. The cause is exactly the same thing that led to the loss of agricultural jobs 80 to 90 years ago: increasing productivity in that activity.

Remember this the next time a politician rants about ‘creating more manufacturing jobs here in the US.’ Because, the only way this will happen is if the government creates subsidized works projects. Like Solyndra.

Note from Thaddeus: America’s ‘underemployed’ rate equates to a staggering 15.2%

Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) sent me a note* today about today’s “official” unemployment numbers:

[T]he “official” unemployment rate has dipped one tenth of one percent to 8.5% in December, this rate has persisted at over 8% for 35 straight months. Worse, the misleading practice persists of excluding from the unemployment calculation our fellow Americans who despair of finding a job and are no longer actively seeking for employment. Consequently, when our friends, neighbors and loved ones who are no longer looking for work, along with those only able to find part-time work, are included, America’s ‘underemployed’ rate equates to a staggering 23.7 million Americans (15.2%).

The 8.5% number being blasted by the ‘news’ media is a complete scam.

I also received a note from all around smart guy, fellow Michigan blogger and good friend of MCT, 5etester, who pointed me to this article @ Mish’s Global Economics:

Note how the labor force has flat lined for four years even though population growth has averaged 1.5 million for the past 55 years. From 1993 to 2007 population growth was 1.7 million per year!

Thus, the labor force should not suddenly turn flat since retirements do not even come close to explaining the chart. Yet, suddenly the work force has just been frozen in time although the population continues on the same upward trend.

The work force is literally one million smaller than during Bush’s last year in office. This is statistically impossible, at least judging from historic trends.

We also are still 5.6 million people below the employment number of the peak year in 2007. So, practically speaking we have approximately 11.6 million more people unemployed than in 2007.

Be sure to click over to Mish and check out the graph illustrating the fraud being perpetrated on us Americans.

*I’m on McCotters mailing list.

After taxpayer funded vacation, Obama making taxpayer campaign stop in Ohio

Really, Barack?

With the first contest of the Republican presidential primary over, President Barack Obama will hustle to get back into the spotlight, jetting to battleground state Ohio on Wednesday to renew his push for boosting the economy. The White House says the speech at a Shaker Heights high school is official business, but it also makes clear that Obama doesn’t plan to keep a low profile as Republicans narrow their contest for a challenger.

Sunday Night Links: The 1950′s Auto Design Edition

January 1st, 2012… Only 310 days until Election day.

I found these great 1950′s posters @ Vintagraph.com

Now, on to the links.

Sentry Journal : The Best of “The Plain Truth” 2011 & my New Year’s resolution
The Eye: A New Year is Upon Us
Gator: You might be a Redneck if……
theCL: theCL Report (December 30, 2011)
CH2.0: Occupod Roundup

GTBTBA: I’m Not a Conservative
Spellchek: Need a job? How about SEIU Home Care? Must be qualified in civil disobedience
Bunker: Reagan’s call to duty
LAS: 2011 Review & 2012 Preview
MTTM: Agenda 21 Explained In Another Way

Moonbattery: Glitter-bombed 
RR: What’s Going on With Ann Coulter?
Republican Mom: An interesting application of Google Trends
Wade: Republicans and Ron Paul Supporters Not Immune To Kool-Aid
WWTFT: The Founders on Power

WyBlog: Meet the new year, same as the old year
FCBZ:  Violent NY Occupiers on New Year’s Eve
Proof: On New Year’s Resolutions
CP: Happy Reset,,,If We can ?
This is a few days old, but here is an update from Jim @ CoF: Feliz Navidad y  Prospera Año Nuevo

Acoustic version of Sweet Child O’ Mine performed by Slash and Myles Kennedy

This is a fantastic version of Sweet Child O’ Mine performed by Slash and Myles Kennedy from Alter Bridge.

YouTube Preview Image

Happy New Year and the countdown to November 6th begins now.

Leading From Behind: Obama and the 2012 ‘Banished Word List’

I’m not sure if academics at Lake Superior State University are trying to help their fellow academic who occupies the White House by giving a subtle hints that his message is not resonating.

Here is the list. And, as a bonus, I’ve found a few video example with the Lecturer in Chief giving usage examples to help everyone remember how not to use the banished words.

Amazing

Baby Bump

Shared Sacrifice:

YouTube Preview Image

Occupy:

YouTube Preview Image

Blowback (Obama doesn’t use the word ‘blowback’ in the clip. However, if the media wasn’t in the tank for him, he would experience much more ‘blowback’ over this scandal):

YouTube Preview Image

Man Cave

New Normal:

“What is a danger is that we stay stuck in a new normal where unemployment rates stay high. People who have jobs see their incomes go up. Businesses make big profits, but they’ve learned to do more with less. And so they don’t hire. And, as a consequence, we keep on seeing growth that is just too slow to bring back the eight million jobs that were lost. That is a danger. So, that’s something that I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about.”

Pet Parent (this term should have never been created in the first place)

Win The Future:

YouTube Preview Image

Trickeration

Ginormous

Thank you in advance

Van Halen news update plus a classic VH Video

With all the depressing news in the world today, here is something that really cheers me up (since I’m a big time VH fan). Info shamelessly lifted from VHND:

JANUARY 3rd: 
*CONCERT DATES & CITIES ANNOUNCED for first wave of tour

JANUARY 10th: 
*FIRST SINGLE PREMIERE
*FIRST MUSIC VIDEO PREMIERE
*CONCERT TICKETS GO ON SALE

FEBRUARY 7th: 
NEW ALBUM RELEASE DATE

I think I’ll have to head out and catch show when Van Halen gets to Motown (or, more likely, Auburn Hills).

And to get fired up for the upcoming tour, here is a vintage VH video (the video quality isn’t the best, but the performance is great) of the band covering Elvis in Brazil back in ’83.

YouTube Preview Image

Too cool.

Newt Video: Christmas Day 1776

I’m still in the ‘anybody be Romney’ camp as far as 2012 goes. Furthermore, I’m not sold on Newt however, I really like this video.

YouTube Preview Image

Interesting Graphs: Unemployment in The Obama Era

First up is the now famous projected unemployment rate with and without stimulus legislation / spending graph with actual results plotted.

While this is damming to the liberal spending agenda on its own, it doesn’t tell the entire underemployment story.

Via American Enterprise Blog:

The real unemployment rate. The official (U-3) unemployment rate is 8.6 percent. But the labor force has been shrinking as discouraged workers have been disappeared by government statisticians rather than counted as unemployed. But what if they weren’t? What if the Labor Department added those folks back into the numbers? 

You get this:

So much for Liberal economic policies.

h/t Instapundit.