Obama thinks he’s a shoe-in for 2012, promises Russia missile defense cut

Obama is full of himself:

The exchange:

President Obama: On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space.

President Medvedev: Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…

President Obama: This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.

President Medvedev: I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.

When asked to explain what President Obama meant, deputy national security adviser for strategic communications Ben Rhodes told ABC News that there is room for the U.S. and Russia to reach an accommodation, but “there is a lot of rhetoric around this issue — there always is — in both countries.

Uhhhh…. Rhetoric? Obama promised cuts to missile defense during the 2008 campaign.

YouTube Preview Image

And, when it comes to Obama promises that are bad for America, Obama keeps his promises. Remember his promise that energy prices will necessarily skyrocket?

More Green Energy Corruption: Obama funded company under investigation for insider trading

Honestly, who is surprised by this?

Via Pat Dollard:

A company awarded $126.2 million in stimulus taxpayer funds from the U. S. Department of Energy is under investigation for insider trading according to a federal subpoena obtained by CBS News.

The company, San Francisco-based Ecotality, makes and installs chargers for electric cars.

The company received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission in October of 2010.

The president of Ecotality North America Don Karner was sent an additional subpoena in December of 2011, which specifically asks for any and all documentation surrounding the public announcement of the first Department of Energy grant to the company for $99.8 million on August 5, 2009.

Unreal.

More Hope & More Change: Gun sales boom in expectation of Obama re-election

People are beginning to worry that Obama will win this November:

Gun sales are booming across Texas, and some buyers say their growing belief that President Barack Obama will inevitably be re-elected is fueling their race to bear more arms.

And sales haven’t just risen in Texas. There’s been a rush nationwide, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram (http://bit.ly/y3YDO6 ) reported in Sunday’s edition.

The Cheaper than Dirt gun store in Fort Worth set a sales record for February, said store owner DeWayne Irwin, who described the rush as similar to one seen shortly after Obama’s 2008 election.

“We’re at the top of the roller coaster, and we’re about to plummet down the side,” Irwin told the Star-Telegram. “It’s fixing to happen again. I don’t know if it will be to the same extent it was before, but I see it coming.”

Obama winning = America losing.

Politicians everywhere are racing to solve economic problems that don’t exist

My favorite economic writer, Tim Worstall points out that manufacturing output has steadily increased in the UK for some time, while manufacturing employment has steadily dropped.

Manufacturing output is well over twice what it was in 1950. Heck, it was higher when Maggie left office then when she entered it, higher when Major left than when he entered.

There has been a decline in manufacturing employment, yes. But then there’s been a decline in manufacturing employment right around the world. Really, the whole world is losing manufacturing jobs. Even China is losing manufacturing jobs.

This subject has been covered here at MCT for some time and even posted about China losing manufacturing jobs as well.

Mr. Worstall points out the political problem created by increased productivity. And it is only a political problem because, economically speaking, increases in productivity are a good thing.

If they were instead asking “what do we do with dim Northern boys now manufacturing is too productive to need them” then at least they would be asking a question about something that is actually happening: however stupid their answers were.

But running around trying to solve a problem that doesn’t actually exist is simply stupid or politics: but then I repeat myself.

I think the correct term for politicians trying to solve problems that don’t exist is “pandering.”

Michigan GOP primary: I thought it was the delegates that count

All day today, it seems everywhere you looked the Romney faction (media elites and party insiders) have declared victory in the Michigan primary.

Via MLive:

Romney’s victory sets him up as the clear front-runner heading into next week’s Super Tuesday, snatching momentum from chief rival Rick Santorum in a contest that was more expensive and nastier than he likely imagined.
But the battle allowed Romney to “unleash his superior organization,” as one scholar described it, flexing his financial muscle to the tune of $6 million. While the former Massachusetts governor might have preferred to use those resources later, it was available to tap when he needed it most.
“For Santorum to keep fighting seems like it is delaying the inevitable, almost to the point of being counter-productive for the party,” said Whitt Kilburn, a Grand Valley State University political science professor. “It seems that Romney is going to get the nomination unless he totally collapses.”

Sure, this is all fine and good except Romney and Santorum split Michigan’s 30 delegates 15 each.

Delegates and not the popular vote count toward the nomination. It takes 1144 delegates to win the GOP nomination.  When you look at the delegate count to-date, Romney has 149 delegates or 13% of the required to Santorum 86 delegates (7.5% of the required total).

In today’s Twilight Zone political environment, a tie is called a win (for Romney) and a 63 delegate lead (with 2002 delegates still up for grabs) somehow makes Romney a clear front-runner.

It is such a political Twilight Zone, you would think the media and the political elites are in the tank for Romney.

Nahhh… That can’t be happening.

Eco-warriors are now experts on global commodities

Unreal.

Conversely, lets suppose that liquid-fuel-hungry US and Chinese and Brazilian economies strengthen this summer. US liquid fuel prices, driven by growing global demand, would rise. Voters would be looking for a scapegoat, having even less money left from their pay. Will they blame oil companies, the Obama Administration, ‘furniners,’ or all of the above? Hard to say isn’t it?

One question for or Treehugging global commodities expert; why are US liquid fuel prices (i.e. gasoline) rising while demand within the United States has been nose-diving for several years?

The answer is we are seeing inflation (due to ‘Quantitative Easing’- printing of money) rather than any effect of global demand or the effects of oil scarcity.

Of course, our Treehugging global commodities expert thinks this inflation is a good thing.

Volatile gas prices would be a good thing.
High price variability at the pump from now on in to the fall election would be the best thing there is for the environment and public health. People who have no grasp of the fact that fuel prices are driven by global supply and global demand would figure that the free market is not going to fix this one. Given the choice between buying a fuel efficient car or not, more Americans would opt for individual responsibility and get the efficient model.

Sure, it will be great for ‘environment’ that our entire economy collapses. Because, our Treehugging global commodities expert is forgetting, our entire economy is based on energy. And when energy gets expensive,  everything else becomes expensive. Roll the expensive energy back into our economy that is already under inflationary pressure and we have a recipe for economic hardship for a long time to come.

Of course our Treehugging global commodities expert will be happy with no economic activity- because he will think this is good for ‘the environment.’

Except, as pointed out numerous times here at MCT, only wealthy countries can worry about the environment.

I’m sure Art Laffer smiled after reading about the UK’s additional tax on “the rich”

I saw this short news clip (via TaxProf from a link posted on Instapundit) discussing a fall in tax money inflow* to the UK government after implementing an additional tax on “the rich”:

The Treasury received £10.35 billion in income tax payments from those paying by self-assessment last month, a drop of £509 million compared with January 2011. Most other taxes produced higher revenues over the same period.
Senior sources said that the first official figures indicated that there had been “manoeuvring” by well-off Britons to avoid the new higher rate. The figures will add to pressure on the Coalition to drop the levy amid fears it is forcing entrepreneurs to relocate abroad.

You can almost hear Art Laffer saying “I told you so… Again.”

*Note: Washington does not need to collect more money. Our federal government has a huge spending problem, not an income problem. More money flowing to Washington is not going to cure their spending addiction. The idea is to illustrate that tax cuts coupled with spending cuts, will help bring Washington back into fiscal balance, while at the same time improve the overall health of the private sector economy. To maximize personal freedom and long-term economic health, we should follow the advice of another great economist, Milton Friedman, who said “I am favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever it’s possible.“

Tim Geithner: Higher taxes on wealthy for the “privilege of being an American”

The United States finances are swirling in ever tighter circles closer the drain and the best solution Obama’s Treasury tool, Tim Geithner, can propose is  ”wealthy people need to pay more taxes.”

Really, that’s his and Obama’s solution to our fiscal problem. Here is the video:

YouTube Preview Image

And the transcript:

“That’s the kind of balance you need,” said Geithner. “Why is that the case? Because if you don’t try to generate more revenues through tax reform, if you don’t ask, you know, the most fortunate Americans to bear a slightly larger burden of the privilege of being an American, then you have to — the only way to achieve fiscal sustainability is through unacceptably deep cuts in benefits for middle class seniors, or unacceptably deep cuts in national security.”

It has been 2 years, 9 months and 25 days since the Democrat controlled Senate has passed a budget (the Republican House has passed many). With this kind of irresponsibility permeating Washington,  it is no surprise that our nation is faced with runaway deficits and is going to hit ANOTHER debt ‘ceiling’ in a matter of months.

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill had hoped that last summer’s deal to end the nasty fight over lifting the debt ceiling would ensure the issue wouldn’t resurface until at least 2013.

But the Bipartisan Policy Center said Friday that the debt-limit doomsday could come earlier than that.

Analysts from the Bipartisan Policy Center projected that the United States will hit its $16.4 trillion debt ceiling between late November 2012 and early January 2013 due to lower-than-expected corporate tax revenues and the recent extension of the payroll tax holiday.

Of course, insane levels of spending are not part of the problem at all (according to Politico).

You would think that Obama, as the leader of the Democrat party, could use his otherworldly abilities* and superior intellect* to get Harry Reid to pass a simple budget.

After all, it is Congresses responsibility to pass a budget.

*By the way, remember when people seriously referred to Obama as a ‘Lightworker’?

Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul.

The unusual thing is, true Lightworkers almost never appear on such a brutal, spiritually demeaning stage as national politics. This is why Obama is so rare. And this why he is so often compared to Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., to those leaders in our culture whose stirring vibrations still resonate throughout our short history.

I wonder if Mr. Morford feels a slight bit of embarrassment when he thinks back to writing the above article.

Nahhh…

Committed leftists feel no sense of embarrassment. I mean, look at Geithner. He was busted for not paying his taxes and still is head of the U.S. Treasury as it speeds toward complete collapse. All the while calling for people to pay more taxes.