Coming soon to a car near you: Vibrant color “head up” display


This looks interesting:

Most existing head-up displays generate images using LCDs. Light-emitting diodes produce light and liquid crystal arrays act as shutters, controlling whether or not light reaches each pixel. This approach drains power, and the images often aren’t bright enough to be visible in daylight. Newer displays use either liquid crystal devices or hundreds of tiny mirrors to reflect light onto each pixel. While more energy efficient, these displays are still not very bright.

Microvision’s system uses a set of three lasers—red, green and blue—and a single, millimeter-wide silicon mirror that tilts on two axes. The lasers put out light at different intensities, and the three colors are mixed to produce the final pixel color. As the lasers shine light on the mirror, it rapidly scans horizontally and vertically, painting the image onto the windshield one pixel at a time. This happens so fast that the image looks static. Evans says that the lasers’ pure, saturated colors result in more vivid images with a higher contrast ratio, so they are visible in daylight. Illuminating one pixel at a time also saves energy. And the use of a single mirror rather than an array makes the device smaller, simpler, and cheaper.

Why is it I always think of this when someone mentions lasers?

YouTube Preview Image

2013 Viper Photos

This is one nice looking car…

According to the Detroit News the 2013 Viper puts up serious performance numbers:

Gilles said in an interview that the new Viper has stability control and a new “launch control button” to speed the first-gear rollout. It will be the first Viper to have cruise control and will among the fastest vehicles in the world.

The new Viper has a full leather interior and is about 100 pounds lighter than the last version.

It will have 640 horsepower, 600 pounds of torque and will top out at 206 miles per hour, about 5 miles per hour faster than the previous version.

It’s the highest naturally aspirated torque engine in the world,” Gilles said. “It makes more torque off idle than most cars make at full power.”

Gilles said the Viper represents what Chrysler is all about.

“I think (the Viper) represents the soul of the company,” Gilles said, noting the intense interest in the car among fans, journalists and other auto company executives. “The car is a rock star all by itself.”

Rock Star is fitting…

Kids Today: Fewer teens and young adults getting drivers licence

This is so true…

In 1983, a third of all licensed drivers in the United States were under age 30. Today, only about 22 percent of drivers are twentysomethings or teenagers. Further, about 94 percent of Americans in their 20s had a driver’s license in 1983, compared to about 84 percent in 2008.

Canada, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, Sweden, Norway and South Korea have seen similar declines over time. However, countries such as Israel, Finland, Poland, Latvia, Spain, Switzerland and the Netherlands have experienced an increase in both young and older drivers over time—although the increase was generally smaller among the younger group.

“Higher societal wealth, an older population in general and a higher proportion of the population living in megacities were each associated with higher licensure rates among young persons,” said Sivak, a research professor at UMTRI. “These patterns are possibly reflections of higher mobility being associated with these factors.

“On the other hand, countries with higher proportions of Internet users were associated with lower licensure rates among young persons, which is consistent with the hypothesis that access to virtual contact through electronic means reduces the need for actual contact among young people.”

Teens and young adults are in constant communication with each other creating less need for obtaining a drivers licence.

Jeep J-12 Concept truck


This is cool:

If you’re thinking that the J-12 concept looks to be a Wrangler Unlimited fitted with the JK-8 Independence pickup conversion kit and the face of a 1960s-era Jeep J-series Gladiator truck, that’s because it is one. Of course, Jeep didn’t simply graft the face of an old Gladiator onto the front of a JK-8. It also added 18 inches of length to the back of the donor Wrangler Unlimited’s frame, resulting in a full six-foot pickup bed. Functionally, Jeep installed a three-inch suspension lift, new sway bars, and locking axles front and rear. The J-12’s wheel and tire package—old-school 16-inch smooth steel wheels and 36-inch tires—really add to the pickup’s classic feel. Inside, Jeep melded two bucket seats together to create a sort of bench seat. Just like the FC, the J-12 gets plaid cloth accents throughout the interior.

I hope Chrysler goes forward with this concept.

The nanny state grows: NHTSA to require rear-view cameras in all new cars by 2014

The march of the nanny state continues unabated:

US federal regulators are expected to announce plans this week to require automakers to install rearview cameras in all new cars by 2014, The New York Times reported.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is expected to send its final version of the proposed regulation to Congress on Wednesday, after first proposing the rule change in 2010.
Government statistics show that 228 people of all ages die in the US each year after being hit by passenger vehicles backing up, while roughly 17,000 people are injured.

“We haven’t done anything else to protect pedestrians,” Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety in Washington, told the newspaper. “This is one thing we can do and should do.”

Once rear-view cameras become commonplace, you know drivers will ignore / overlook them.

Sunday Night Links: The 1950′s Auto Design Edition

January 1st, 2012… Only 310 days until Election day.

I found these great 1950′s posters @ Vintagraph.com

Now, on to the links.

Sentry Journal : The Best of “The Plain Truth” 2011 & my New Year’s resolution
The Eye: A New Year is Upon Us
Gator: You might be a Redneck if……
theCL: theCL Report (December 30, 2011)
CH2.0: Occupod Roundup

GTBTBA: I’m Not a Conservative
Spellchek: Need a job? How about SEIU Home Care? Must be qualified in civil disobedience
Bunker: Reagan’s call to duty
LAS: 2011 Review & 2012 Preview
MTTM: Agenda 21 Explained In Another Way

Moonbattery: Glitter-bombed 
RR: What’s Going on With Ann Coulter?
Republican Mom: An interesting application of Google Trends
Wade: Republicans and Ron Paul Supporters Not Immune To Kool-Aid
WWTFT: The Founders on Power

WyBlog: Meet the new year, same as the old year
FCBZ:  Violent NY Occupiers on New Year’s Eve
Proof: On New Year’s Resolutions
CP: Happy Reset,,,If We can ?
This is a few days old, but here is an update from Jim @ CoF: Feliz Navidad y  Prospera Año Nuevo

Nanny State Gone Wild: Feds Pushing To Ban Cell Phone Use In Cars Using Skewed Data

First, they came for our light bulbs. Now they want to ban all cell phone use in cars:

The National Transportation Safety Board said on Tuesday that it had voted to recommend the ban on the use of mobile devices by drivers, citing what it said were the risks of distracted driving.

The recommended ban applies to hands-free devices, a recommendation that goes further than any state law to date. The agency said it is recommending that drivers be allowed to use their phones for emergency purposes.

“No call, no text, no update is worth a human life,” said Deborah A. P. Hersman, chairman of the N.T.S.B., an independent federal agency that is responsible for promoting traffic safety and investigating accidents and their causes. It will be up to the states to decide whether they want to follow the agency’s recommendation.

She said the decision was a hard one because such a ban would be unpopular among some people. But she said its time had come, given what she said were growing distractions in the car and the spread of increasingly powerful mobile devices.

However,  a researcher at Wayne State University in Detroit says not so fast.

In the new report, Richard A. Young of Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit finds that two influential studies on the subject might have overestimated the risk.

The problem has to do with the studies’ methods, according to Young. Both studies a 1997 study from Canada, and one done in Australia in 2005 were “case-crossover” studies.

The researchers recruited people who had been in a crash, and then used their billing records to compare their cellphone use around the time of the crash with their cell use during the same time period the week before (called a “control window”).

But the issue with that, Young writes in the journal Epidemiology, is that people may not have been driving during that entire control window.

Such “part-time” driving, he says, would necessarily cut the odds of having a crash (and possibly reduce people’s cell use) during the control window and make it seem like cellphone use is a bigger crash risk than it is.

The two studies in question asked people whether they had been driving during the control windows, but they did not account for part-time driving, Young says.

Just like the global warming hoax, researchers overstate data supporting their desired results. Then, government bureaucrats latch on to the flawed research, increasing their reach into every facet of our lives.