Made In Detroit: A new way to make lighter, stronger steel

click for larger view

This is really a big deal… And it was invented in Detroit.

A Detroit entrepreneur surprised university engineers here recently, when he invented a heat-treatment that makes steel 7 percent stronger than any steel on record – in less than 10 seconds.

In fact, the steel, now trademarked as Flash Bainite, has tested stronger and more shock-absorbing than the most common titanium alloys used by industry.

The Flash Bainite process is a new way to heat treat steel in 10 seconds rather than in hours (or days) like current processes.

“Steel is what we would call a ‘mature technology.’ We’d like to think we know most everything about it,” he said. “If someone invented a way to strengthen the strongest steels even a few percent, that would be a big deal. But 7 percent? That’s huge.”

Yet, when inventor Gary Cola initially approached him, Babu didn’t know what to think.

“The process that Gary described – it shouldn’t have worked,” he said. “I didn’t believe him. So he took my students and me to Detroit.”

Cola showed them his proprietary lab setup at SFP Works, LLC., where rollers carried steel sheets through flames as hot as 1100 degrees Celsius and then into a cooling liquid bath.

Though the typical temperature and length of time for hardening varies by industry, most steels are heat-treated at around 900 degrees Celsius for a few hours. Others are heated at similar temperatures for days.

Cola’s entire process took less than 10 seconds.

He claimed that the resulting steel was 7 percent stronger than martensitic advanced high-strength steel. [Martensitic steel is so named because the internal microstructure is entirely composed of a crystal form called martensite.] Cola further claimed that his steel could be drawn – that is, thinned and lengthened – 30 percent more than martensitic steels without losing its enhanced strength.

If that were true, then Cola’s steel could enable carmakers to build frames that are up to 30 percent thinner and lighter without compromising safety. Or, it could reinforce an armored vehicle without weighing it down.

“We asked for a few samples to test, and it turned out that everything he said was true,” said Ohio State graduate student Tapasvi Lolla. “Then it was up to us to understand what was happening.”

Cola is a self-taught metallurgist, and he wanted help from Babu and his team to reveal the physics behind the process – to understand it in detail so that he could find ways to adapt it and even improve it.

This is the type of business  that will create a large footprint of economic activity and many spin-offs. I would hope the political leadership in Michigan, who are endlessly prattling on about creating jobs, would clear the decks, remove all regulatory barriers and get Gary Cola processing steel in Michigan.

More Nanny State Run Amok: New Fuel Economy Labels

Today, the EPA, DOT and NHTSA jointly rolled out the ‘new and improved’ fuel economy labels to much contrived fanfare:

These improvements will give consumers better, more complete information to consider when purchasing new vehicles that are covered by the increased fuel economy standards. Starting with model year 2013, the improved fuel economy labels will be required to be affixed to all new passenger cars and trucks – both conventional gasoline powered and “next generation” cars, such as plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles.

Upon taking office, President Obama directed DOT and EPA to prioritize the development of new fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions standards, resulting in the historic standards that will be represented by these new labels. This is the latest step in EPA’s and DOT’s joint efforts to improve the fuel economy and environmental performance of vehicles and to provide consumers with useful information to inform their purchasing decisions

I don’t know what us poor, confused consumers did before we had the new and improved fuel economy labels ‘to help us make better decisions‘ when purchasing a new vehicle (as if we are children who need guidance).

Who knew a Smart Car is more fuel efficient than a Mustang GT?

The Freakonomics Guys Are Catching Up To MCT On Electric Vehicles

If you read the Freakonomics Blog, you would read this about Electric Vehicles today:

Electric cars are all the rage today, but some of the smartest people I know believe that moving towards electric vehicles is a terrible idea.

It’s like the Freakonomic guys have been reading motorcitytimes.com since its inception.

The blog post continues pointing out (eerily mirroring motorcitytimes.com)out the flawed economics of Electric vehicles:

Looking casually as an outsider at the unappealing economics of electric vehicles (the need for a new and immensely expensive infrastructure, cars that cost much more than either traditional gas engines or hybrids, limited ranges and long recharging times), I find it hard to understand why the Obama administration is pushing electric cars

Then the Freakonomics post moves on to a discussion of another MCT mainstay, rare earth materials:

Be careful what you wish for, however, because if electric cars become a mainstay, we may be trading one dependence for another that is even more troubling. Ninety-five percent of the world’s output of rare-earth metals today comes from one country: China. By some estimates, demand will outstrip supply within five years.

This sounds remarkably like a MCT post titled No Free Lunches: Trade Expensive Imported Foreign Oil For Expensive Imported Foreign Lithium (June 8th, 2010):

If goal is to move to large scale electric vehicle production. the next problem is where are we going to get the lithium needed to construct the batteries? The United States has only a very small reserve of lithium. The majority (by some estimates over half) the worlds lithium resides in Bolivia. So, rather than import expensive and dangerous foreign oil from places like Canada and Mexico we will end up importing expensive and dangerous foreign lithium from places like Bolivia.

Even the supply chain to construct these electric cars are going to require lots of petroleum. Are we going to use sail powered vessels to ship the lithium from Bolivia? Of course not. The entire supply chain, including shipping, will require petroleum.

It’s good to see that people are starting to catch on that the electric vehicle is not going to live up to the liberal / environmentalists hype.

Here are a few posts @MCT concerning electric vehicles / rare earth materials and green energy for your perusal:

More On Rare Earth Materials: China Is Reducing Exports By 10% In 2011

Rare Earth Materials And The Incompetence Of Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)

Electric Vehicles: Hyped For One Hundred Years

Obama’s Volt 281… 2011 Dodge Charger 3,263

Obma’s SOTU And His Flawed Green Energy Economics

Pravda: Energy is the keystone to any and every economy

GM Sells 493 Chevy Volts in April While Chrysler Sells 9802 Grand Cherokees


493 Chevy Volts sold in the month of April… I’m so glad the State of Michigan, under the ‘stellar’ leadership of Democrat Jennifer Granholm, decided that Michigan is going to focus on the lithium-ion advanced battery for electric cars.

While sales of the Volt and Nissan Leaf (a whopping 573 sold this April) continue to flounder, the unabashed Jeep Grand Cherokee SUV sold 9802 units for the month of April.

Smug Liberals Today: $4.00 Gas Not That Big A Deal

If you roll back the clock to August 2008 and liberals we using $4.00 /gal. gas prices as short hand for really expensive:

House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford Township, noted that the House package evolved from hours of talks among all stakeholders, but now he feels as if he’s starting from scratch in talks with Senate leadership — including listening to a demand for a huge unspecified tax cut.

“What they are ignoring is the cost of doing nothing,” Dillon said, adding that Michiganders have become more attentive to the state energy debate as gasoline costs have risen. “If we don’t plan, we’ll be at $4-a-gallon electricity.

Of course, Democrat Dillon was pushing for legislation mandating the fallacy of green energy, but you get the point.

Fast forward to today, and we get a smug column from Tom Walsh @ the very liberal Detroit Free Press telling us that, hey, don’t panic when gas is above $4.00 / gal.

But me? Personally, I’m opting for the no-panic button. Three reasons:

1.) Oil prices are peaking now and will head back down soon. Happens every time after a big price spike.

2.) I bought a hybrid.

3.) Don’t obsess over stuff you can’t control or predict.

Mark Perry, economics professor at University of Michigan-Flint and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, says the U.S. Energy Department projects that gas prices will level off and fall to $3.60 by the end of 2012.

According to Tom Walsh, don’t sweat it guys, there is nothing us little people can do about gas prices so suck it up. Besides, according to Obama we will be Brazil’s best customer when it comes the purchase of oil.

Mr. Walsh continues his column pointing out he is greener than thou because he purchased a hybrid. And due to his superior vehicle purchase he is more insulated to fuel price swings than the average person:

Of course, we did pay a premium for the hybrid version — but even if the total operating cost comparison was a wash, I’d rather pay more money to Ford and its U.S. workers than pay it to Saudi sheikhs for extra fuel.

Ohhh the ‘dangerous’ foreign oil argument. I’m pretty sure there are few oil rich Saudi sheikhs running around Canada and Mexico. You know, where we in the United States get the majority of our foreign oil.

When you think about it, there are major oil drilling going on just across our northern and southern borders and we are putting the breaks on developing our own real energy resources.

Crude Oil Imports (Top 15 Countries)
(Thousand Barrels per Day)
Country Feb-11 Jan-11 YTD 2011 Feb-10 YTD 2010

CANADA 2,193 2,149 2,170 1,897 1,889
SAUDI ARABIA 1,114 1,099 1,106 881 922
MEXICO 998 1,216 1,112 996 1,015
NIGERIA 948 968 958 896 948
VENEZUELA 878 951 916 913 868
ANGOLA 357 294 323 312 289
IRAQ 263 470 372 540 522
ECUADOR 242 178 209 145 182
BRAZIL 175 259 219 192 233
COLOMBIA 175 303 242 371 330
ALGERIA 138 378 264 282 306
KUWAIT 118 147 133 228 143
RUSSIA 97 105 101 214 174
EQUATORIAL GUINEA 52 32 41 0 28
CHAD 51 55 53 0 24

2012 VW Beetle


click for larger image

According to the VW web site:

David Shepardson of The Detroit News writes, “The company hopes to regain the luster of the iconic Beetle brand that remains one of the best known auto brands by appealing to more men—as the original version did” by “aiming to shed the ‘chick car’ label.” Shepardson goes on to quote VW design brand chief Klaus Bischoff, who says, “The Beetle is now characterized by a clean, self-confident and dominant sportiness,” adding that VW “wanted the vehicle to be more sporty, dynamic and masculine.” We’d say he more than achieved that. Kudos, Klaus!

click for larger version

click for larger version

click for larger version

I like the new look of this Beetle, and agree it is a lot less a ‘chick’ car that the previous model.

Treehuggers everywhere are still trying to spin the latest EV sales numbers as a success


The treehughers at ‘Smart Planet’ are working overtime trying to hype the month over month sales increase of the Chevy Volt- from February 2011 to March 2011:

General Motors sold 608 Volts in March, a small amount relative to larger brands, but more than double February’s tally. GM sold more Volts in March than it did in January and February combined..

If our green friends picked up a car magazine and read it (without sneering that everyone should be riding bicycles) they would understand WHY car companies publish sales numbers comparing year over year sales numbers for each month. For example, they would understand why they see numbers presented like this:

Strong sales to commercial fleet customers as well as higher sales to retail customers powered Ford truck sales growth in March. Sales of Ford’s F-Series truck totaled 53,272, up 25 percent versus a year ago.

Sales numbers are presented this way because some months are traditionally better for car sales than others. Looking year over year sales figures is a way to account for these differences.

Therefore, an increase of 327 units sold March over February is not a trend. Looking at the changes in sales figures between February 2011 and March 2011 bares this out. For the month of February (2011) Chrysler sold 3,263 Chargers. Last month (March, 201) the number look even better for the new Dodge Charger.

[T]he 2011 Dodge Charger with 8,986 sedans sold (a 44% gain) as the family-sized muscle car was almost able to overtake the Caravan as the brand’s top seller.

Looking at the above numbers takes some of the wind out of our treehugging friend’s sails.

Video: 2012 Camaro ZL1 Preview


click for larger version

This is one sweet car. Via egmCarTech:

Refresher: Power for the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 comes from a LSA 6.2L supercharged V8 making 550-hp at 6,100 rpm and 550 lb-ft at 3,800 rpm. The engine is matched to a Tremec TR-6060 6-speed manual transmission with a new shorter-throw shifter that improves gear changes. It also features a dual-mode exhaust system which provides a very throaty and powerful sound. Sales begin in early 2012.

Video preview:

YouTube Preview Image

I’m sure the ZL1 will sell better than the Nissan Leaf or Chevy Volt.

click for larger version

EU proposal to ban gas and diesel-powered cars by 2050

I hope Obama and his fellow leftists in Washington don’t catch wind of this.

The European Commission said phasing out “conventionally fuelled” cars from urban areas would cut reliance on oil and help cut carbon emissions by 60%.

……

Outlining plans for a “Single European Transport Area”, the Commission said there needed to be a “profound shift” in travel patterns to reduce reliance on oil and to lower emissions from transport by 60% by 2050.

Travel shift

As part of this, it wants half of “middle distance journeys” between cities – above approximately 186 miles – to shift from road to rail.

Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas said this move, plus the phasing out of petrol or diesel cars in city centres, need not inconvenience people.

“Freedom to travel is a basic right for our citizens,” he said. “Curbing mobility is not an option. Nor is business is usual.”

“The widely-held belief that you need to cut mobility to fight climate change is simply not true. We can break the transport system’s dependence on oil without sacrificing its efficiency and compromising mobility.

What a bad idea. And like most bad ideas that start in Europe, they tend to find their way here to the United States. However, not everyone in Europe is sold on the idea. Surprisingly, some minsters in the UK are not completely on-board with this proposal.

But ministers indicated they would not be adopting the main plank of the EU plan.

“It is right that the EU sets high-level targets for carbon reduction, however it is not right for them to get involved in how this is delivered in individual cities,” Mr Baker said.

“We are committed to decarbonising road transport by, for example, investing more than £400m over the next four years to support electric vehicles and promoting alternatives to car travel like walking and cycling.”

The carbon that politicians in Europe are working to decarbonise (decarbonising…. A perfect imaginary word to accompany the imaginary problem of global warming) from road transport is carbon dioxide, the gas all humans exhale. The politicians will be trading carbon dioxide from gas powered cars to carbon dioxide spewing people riding their bicycles everywhere.

Plus those coal powered electric vehicles are only going to shift the source of CO2 from the tail pipe of the car to the smoke stack of the power plant.