Our First, Most Cherished Liberty: Catholic Bishops call for civil disobedience to an “unjust law”

Catholic Bishops are fighting back against Obama’s “health care law” and have issued a very powerful statement rejecting Obama’s healthcare law (and several other governmental assaults on personal freedom and liberty).

The following are few key excerpts:

Religious Liberty Is More Than Freedom of Worship
Religious liberty is not only about our ability to go to Mass on Sunday or pray the Rosary at home. It is about whether we can make our contribution to the common good of all Americans. Can we do the good works our faith calls us to do, without having to compromise that very same faith? Without religious liberty properly understood, all Americans suffer, deprived of the essential contribution in education, health care, feeding the hungry, civil rights, and social services that religious Americans make every day, both here at home and overseas.

What is at stake is whether America will continue to have a free, creative, and robust civil society—or whether the state alone will determine who gets to contribute to the common good, and how they get to do it. Religious believers are part of American civil society, which includes neighbors helping each other, community associations, fraternal service clubs, sports leagues, and youth groups. All these Americans make their contribution to our common life, and they do not need the permission of the government to do so. Restrictions on religious liberty are an attack on civil society and the American genius for voluntary associations.

The Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America issued a statement about the administration’s contraception and sterilization mandate that captured exactly the danger that we face:

Most troubling, is the Administration’s underlying rationale for its decision, which appears to be a view that if a religious entity is not insular, but engaged with broader society, it loses its “religious” character and liberties. Many faiths firmly believe in being open to and engaged with broader society and fellow citizens of other faiths. The Administration’s ruling makes the price of such an outward approach the violation of an organization’s religious principles. This is deeply disappointing.

This is not a Catholic issue. This is not a Jewish issue. This is not an Orthodox, Mormon, or Muslim issue. It is an American issue.

Exactly.

The Bishop’s continue; pointing out that many laws emanating from Washington are unjust laws and, therefore should not be followed.

In his famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in 1963, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. boldly said, “The goal of America is freedom.” As a Christian pastor, he argued that to call America to the full measure of that freedom was the specific contribution Christians are obliged to make. He rooted his legal and constitutional arguments about justice in the long Christian tradition:

I would agree with Saint Augustine that “An unjust law is no law at all.” Now what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of Saint Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.

It is a sobering thing to contemplate our government enacting an unjust law. An unjust law cannot be obeyed. In the face of an unjust law, an accommodation is not to be sought, especially by resorting to equivocal words and deceptive practices. If we face today the prospect of unjust laws, then Catholics in America, in solidarity with our fellow citizens, must have the courage not to obey them. No American desires this. No Catholic welcomes it. But if it should fall upon us, we must discharge it as a duty of citizenship and an obligation of faith.

It is essential to understand the distinction between conscientious objection and an unjust law. Conscientious objection permits some relief to those who object to a just law for reasons of conscience—conscription being the most well-known example. An unjust law is “no law at all.” It cannot be obeyed, and therefore one does not seek relief from it, but rather its repeal.

The Christian church does not ask for special treatment, simply the rights of religious freedom for all citizens. Rev. King also explained that the church is neither the master nor the servant of the state, but its conscience, guide, and critic.

Be sure to read the rest. It is a very powerful statement.

It’s interesting this hasn’t made a bigger splash in the media. As pointed out at Ace O’ Spades:

It’s surprising how little press this got, considering how much the make-believe-media loves to bash Christians. Explicitly calling for Americans to ignore or disobey a law beloved to the Left is certainly otherwise newsworthy, no?

Perhaps the media wants to ignore this because polls show most Americans agree with the Church that the mandate is a violation of our liberty. A call for open rebellion like this could start an embarrassing preference cascade.

Yep, Obama’s healthcare law is not popular. Not at all.

Obama issues Executive Order cracking down on for-profit colleges

Via The WaPo:

Surrounded by thousands of uniformed members of the Army’s Third Infantry Division, President Obama Friday signed an executive order cracking down on for-profit colleges that prey on service members and veterans to collect tuition dollars without providing meaningful education in return.

Sure…  ”Not for profit” College or University are obviously a better deal for your educational dollars.

If you are looking for a meaningful education, UCLA offers a course on Queer Musicalogy, instructed by Associate Professor Mitchell Morris. Not to be outdone, The University of Michigan (who paid their president, Mary Sue Coleman $783,850 in 2010) offers a minor in Gender, Race, And Nation studies.This gem of a program prepares students with a meaningful education:

Courses examine race and ethnicity in contexts that are local, transnational, or both. They analyze the ways in which gender, race, and nation are constituted with and against each other, and how these constructions operate in discourses, institutions, politics, societies, and individual lives past and present. The academic minor can be tailored toward an international or domestic emphasis, but topics are likely to include the changing boundaries of race, gender, and nation; differential relations among nations; histories of imperialism, colonialism, and globalization; and postcolonial resistance and theory.

Tuition alone (for lower division undergraduates- in state rates) at the public University of Michigan will set you back $12,634 for the 2012-13 fall / winter session alone. What a bargain.

But, if you really want a meaningful education, sign up for Critical Theory and Social Justice program at Occidental College where you you can learn from the likes of  Associate Professor, Jeffrey Tobin.  A few topics of study at Occidental’s Critical Theory and Social Justice program include:

210. MOTHER GOOSE TO MYSPACE: CHILDREN’S LITERATURE AND POPULAR TEXTS
Why did the London Bridge fall down? Is Rub-a-dub-dub really about bath time? Why didn’t an old man live in a shoe? Who is more imperialist, Babar or Peter Pan? Is Tinky Winky gay? Is South Park a children’s show? Is Harry Potter a Hero? How tired was Rosa Parks? Using different critical approaches, this course will examine children’s poetry, picture books, novels, cartoons, feature films, and music videos. Analysis will include topics related to gender, race, culture, and nation, as they play out in the aesthetics, images, and poetics of children’s texts.

And…

342. THE PHALLUS
A survey of psychoanalytic theories of gender and sexuality. Topics include the signification of the phallus, the relation of the phallus to masculinity, femininity, genital organs and the fetish, the whiteness of the phallus, and the lesbian phallus. The authors we read include Freud, Riviere, Lacan, Irigaray, Kristeva, Grosz, Gallop, Silverman, de Laurentis, and Butler. Prerequisite: a 200-level CTSJ class. Emphasis topic: Feminist and Queer Studies.

Looking at only a small slice of the nonsense being taught at “not for profit” colleges and universities today, it seems that Obama’s latest executive order is a bit of pandering to his supporters in the halls of “higher” education.

Heaven forbid that  ”not for profit” colleges face a little competition for tuition dollars.

Oh, by the way, didn’t Obama attend Occidental College?

Italy turning to corporate sponsorship to save cultural and historic sites

Those evil corporations… Via Der Spiegel:

With the country mired in debt, Italy’s cultural budget has been slashed in recent years, spelling trouble for several historic sites. Many local politicians have turned to corporate sponsorships to raise the money necessary for vital upkeep. The trend has attracted considerable criticism.

The story continues.

Zambuto is the mayor of the town of Agrigent in Sicily, and he says the archeological site there is worth €2 billion. He wants to do his part to market that potential. With local elections approaching in May, Zambuto, 39, is on the stump, and his idea of auctioning off the rights to the site, in hopes of attracting major investors from around the world, plays a central role in his campaign speeches. Only the best will be awarded the contract, he promises. The money generated by the auction, he says, will be invested in the urgently needed maintenance of the temples.

“Italy has the world’s largest heritage of cultural treasures,” says Zambuto, “but we do nothing to maintain it. It’s the government’s responsibility, of course, but if the government is broke — well, then Versace can certainly be a solution.” Or Louis Vuitton, for that matter. As long the investor isn’t a Russian oligarch like Mikhail Prokhorov, Vladimir Putin’s challenger in the presidential elections in March, who has reportedly expressed an interest in buying the Temple of Zeus — although no one knows why he wants it.

Remember ideas that start in Europe have a way of working their way here.

Can you imagine a Pepsi Mt. Rushmore Experience?

Pleading for Obama to ‘do something’ passes for editorial perspective at Detroit newspaper

It appears pleading for dear leader to “do something” that will help Detroit out of its death spiral passes for editorial perspective at Detroit’s ‘more conservative’ news paper.

Via The Detroit News editorial page:

President Barack Obama arrives today for a pair of fundraisers in Dearborn and West Bloomfield. The president runs on a tightly controlled schedule, but surely his suburban hosts would forgive a delay to allow him to take a detour through Detroit.

The president should see with his own eyes, and from ground level, the depth and disrepair, abandonment and danger in Detroit’s neighborhoods.

If we could suggest a route, we’d start his tour on Detroit’s largely deserted east side, past the heaps of rubble that were once businesses on Harper near City Airport, and into the blocks surrounding Denby High School off East Outer Drive, where there are more abandoned homes than occupied ones. But he could throw a stone almost anywhere in Detroit and hit neighborhoods that have been eaten away by cancerous blight.

It would be an invaluable field trip for the president — either today or sometime in the near future — to witness the shocking living conditions in so many Detroit neighborhoods. We can only imagine that he would summon the full force of his administration to get creative in seeking ways Washington could help stimulate a community revival in Detroit and, for that matter, other industrial cities that suffer from urban decay.

Really?

The opinion leaders at Detroit’s more conservative paper are pleading for Obama and his fellow Washing politicians to get creative? Didn’t we try creative with Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society (way back in 1964)?

Your imagination and your initiative, and your indignation will determine whether we build a society where progress is the servant of our needs, or a society where old values and new visions are buried under unbridled growth. For in your time we have the opportunity to move not only toward the rich society and the powerful society, but upward to the Great Society.

The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our time. But that is just the beginning.

The Great Society is a place where every child can find knowledge to enrich his mind and to enlarge his talents. It is a place where leisure is a welcome chance to build and reflect, not a feared cause of boredom and restlessness. It is a place where the city of man serves not only the needs of the body and the demands of commerce but the desire for beauty and the hunger for community.

A truly creative solution to our (here in Detroit and the rest of the United States) economic problems would involve local, state and national politicians playing a lot of golf while staying out of the economy.

There’s An App For That: Mobile-Ad Firms Seek New Ways to Track You

Via Technology Review:

Few smart-phone users realize it, but mobile-ad companies track them as they use many free apps. They do this in order to fine-tune the ads the users see. But now that Apple has started to restrict a common way of tracking users, ad companies are scrambling for alternatives, and hoping to “teach” consumers to appreciate the targeted ads that support free apps.

This week, a large consortium of mobile-ad firms launched a new technical approach to tracking users of free apps. The consortium says the new method protects users’ privacy, and will allow people to opt out if they prefer not to have their behavior logged. That opt-out mechanism would be modeled on those offered by online-ad companies for people who do not want their browsing history used to tailor ads.

Previously, mobile ads tracked users on iPhones and iPads by noting their unique device identifier, or UDID, a code assigned to every Apple device and made available to apps installed on them to help those apps store settings and other features. By comparing UDIDs across different apps serving their ads, a company could know how many people had seen a particular campaign. It could also build a database of UDIDs to avoid showing one person the same ads in different apps, or to target users with ads based on the apps they use.

App user be ware…

Another example of American Left trying to sway public opinion away from Second Amendment

Take it away Slow Joe Biden:

“The idea that there’s this overwhelming additional security in the ownership and carrying concealed and deadly weapons… I think it’s the premise, not the constitutional right, but the premise that it makes people safer is one that I’m not so sure of,” Biden said.

The Obama regime will use any excuse (or manufacture one… Fast and Furious) to try turning public opinion away from legal gun ownership.

The good news is, Americans aren’t buying what Obama / Biden / Holder et al. are selling.

Eco-Warriors are still pushing the stupidity known as Earth Hour

Greenies will not give up. Ever.

Even though global warming / cooling / climate change has been exposed for the fraud that it is, the eco-warriors continue marching forward toward their Marxist utopia.

One corporation caught up in the stupidity known as Earth Hour is Wells Fargo.

According to the Wells Fargo blog:

This is our fifth consecutive year as an Earth Hour supporter. We continue to champion the movement in the ways we’ve blogged about before, in both 2010 and 2011.

We’re particularly proud that our Earth Hour promotion appears on more than 12,000 of our ATMs nationwide from today through March 31, and that it will reach millions of our customers!

Its sad to see a historic company, a symbol of American progress and growth, succumb to the leftist, no growth ideology.

I mean, they wrote songs about Wells Fargo back in the day:

YouTube Preview Image

What will the sing about now? Sitting in the cold and dark to ‘save the entire planet?’

Kids Today: Fewer teens and young adults getting drivers licence

This is so true…

In 1983, a third of all licensed drivers in the United States were under age 30. Today, only about 22 percent of drivers are twentysomethings or teenagers. Further, about 94 percent of Americans in their 20s had a driver’s license in 1983, compared to about 84 percent in 2008.

Canada, Great Britain, Germany, Japan, Sweden, Norway and South Korea have seen similar declines over time. However, countries such as Israel, Finland, Poland, Latvia, Spain, Switzerland and the Netherlands have experienced an increase in both young and older drivers over time—although the increase was generally smaller among the younger group.

“Higher societal wealth, an older population in general and a higher proportion of the population living in megacities were each associated with higher licensure rates among young persons,” said Sivak, a research professor at UMTRI. “These patterns are possibly reflections of higher mobility being associated with these factors.

“On the other hand, countries with higher proportions of Internet users were associated with lower licensure rates among young persons, which is consistent with the hypothesis that access to virtual contact through electronic means reduces the need for actual contact among young people.”

Teens and young adults are in constant communication with each other creating less need for obtaining a drivers licence.