Pleading for Obama to ‘do something’ passes for editorial perspective at Detroit newspaper

It appears pleading for dear leader to “do something” that will help Detroit out of its death spiral passes for editorial perspective at Detroit’s ‘more conservative’ news paper.

Via The Detroit News editorial page:

President Barack Obama arrives today for a pair of fundraisers in Dearborn and West Bloomfield. The president runs on a tightly controlled schedule, but surely his suburban hosts would forgive a delay to allow him to take a detour through Detroit.

The president should see with his own eyes, and from ground level, the depth and disrepair, abandonment and danger in Detroit’s neighborhoods.

If we could suggest a route, we’d start his tour on Detroit’s largely deserted east side, past the heaps of rubble that were once businesses on Harper near City Airport, and into the blocks surrounding Denby High School off East Outer Drive, where there are more abandoned homes than occupied ones. But he could throw a stone almost anywhere in Detroit and hit neighborhoods that have been eaten away by cancerous blight.

It would be an invaluable field trip for the president — either today or sometime in the near future — to witness the shocking living conditions in so many Detroit neighborhoods. We can only imagine that he would summon the full force of his administration to get creative in seeking ways Washington could help stimulate a community revival in Detroit and, for that matter, other industrial cities that suffer from urban decay.

Really?

The opinion leaders at Detroit’s more conservative paper are pleading for Obama and his fellow Washing politicians to get creative? Didn’t we try creative with Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society (way back in 1964)?

Your imagination and your initiative, and your indignation will determine whether we build a society where progress is the servant of our needs, or a society where old values and new visions are buried under unbridled growth. For in your time we have the opportunity to move not only toward the rich society and the powerful society, but upward to the Great Society.

The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are totally committed in our time. But that is just the beginning.

The Great Society is a place where every child can find knowledge to enrich his mind and to enlarge his talents. It is a place where leisure is a welcome chance to build and reflect, not a feared cause of boredom and restlessness. It is a place where the city of man serves not only the needs of the body and the demands of commerce but the desire for beauty and the hunger for community.

A truly creative solution to our (here in Detroit and the rest of the United States) economic problems would involve local, state and national politicians playing a lot of golf while staying out of the economy.

When you stop viewing all beings as special creations, you get this

“When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Cambrian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled.”

Charles Darwin,  The Origin of Species (1859)

When you stop viewing all beings as special creations, you get this:

There is not much that is liberal (or enlightened) about modern liberalism.

Federalism: Competition Is Healthy for Governments

It’s good seeing the concept of Federalism being discussed again (surprisingly by a Romney adviser) in political circles:

For much the same reason, competition among governments leads to better governance. In choosing where to live, people can compare public services and taxes. They are attracted to towns that use tax dollars wisely. Competition keeps town managers alert. It prevents governments from exerting substantial monopoly power over residents. If people feel that their taxes exceed the value of their public services, they can go elsewhere. They can, as economists put it, vote with their feet.

The argument applies not only to people but also to capital. Because capital is more mobile than labor, competition among governments significantly constrains how capital is taxed. Corporations benefit from various government services, including infrastructure, the protection of property rights and the enforcement of contracts. But if taxes vastly exceed these benefits, businesses can — and often do — move to places offering a better mix of taxes and services.

Not only does Federalism create competition between local governments, it allows for more decisions being made at the lowest levels of government, pushing more decisions closer to home.

Via MCT (April, 19th 2010):

Federalism is a brilliant concept in that it’s the most effective way for groups of people to organize and operate. In government, business, military or even in team sports, the most effective organizations push decisions to the lowest levels of that organization possible.

A good example of pushing decisions to the lowest level is football. Some of the most important decisions in a game are the “tackle calls” made by offensive lineman. The linemen need to quickly adjust blocking schemes just prior to the snap to pick up defensive stunts, changes in alignment and blitzes. At that point in the game, there is no time for the coach to change the play. The decisions must be made by the players on the field.

In much the same way, a Federalist government pushes more decisions closer to home. This allows for more effective decisions being made by the people most affected by the decisions rather than having decisions made by the bureaucracy in Washington.

After nearly four years of Obama, people understand the importance of Federalism.

Fraudulent Liberal Claim: Conservatism may be a consequence of low-effort thought

Liberal propaganda thinly disguised as serious research.

Via Freakonomics:

It seems that the stereotype of the “thinking liberal” may have some truth. New research (summarized in the BPS Digest) finds that “low-effort” thinking about a given issue is more likely to result in a conservative stance. Here’s the abstract:
The authors test the hypothesis that low-effort thought promotes political conservatism. In Study 1, alcohol intoxication was measured among bar patrons; as blood alcohol level increased, so did political conservatism (controlling for sex, education, and political identification). In Study 2, participants under cognitive load reported more conservative attitudes than their no-load counterparts. In Study 3, time pressure increased participants’ endorsement of conservative terms. In Study 4, participants considering political terms in a cursory manner endorsed conservative terms more than those asked to cogitate; an indicator of effortful thought (recognition memory) partially mediated the relationship between processing effort and conservatism. Together these data suggest that political conservatism may be a process consequence of low-effort thought; when effortful, deliberate thought is disengaged, endorsement of conservative ideology increases.

In other words, if you don’t think too hard, you ‘re a conservative.

Right… Liberals are deep thinkers.

Only a high-effort thinking liberal could design (and proclaim be a champion of) a Ponzi-scheme such as Social Security while simultaneously fighting “tooth and nail” to allow for abortion under all circumstances. Even a low-effort thinking conservative understands keeping the Social Security Ponzi scheme rolling requires an increasing population paying into the system. Murdering a sickening number of unborn children through the liberal sacrament of abortion cripples their number one entitlement: Social Security.

Furthermore, why would any high-effort thinking liberal teacher support a union and movement that will go to the mat supporting abortion?

Would anyone call this the embodiment of high-effort thinking?

Even liberal ‘economic’ policies demonstrate a distinct lack high-effort thought.

Not too long ago, #OWS losers (poster children of liberalism) Tweeted their outrage at ‘corporate greed’ on their Apple iPhones, while sipping Starbucks lattes purchased using their parents debit cards. Is this really high-effort thinking?

So-called low-effort thinking conservatives embrace the Founding Fathers ideals of limited government, liberty, the individual, the concept of Federalism, religious and economic freedom. Conservatives also understand our Founders were students of history and based our Constitution on ideas and principles that have stood the test of time.

History tells us the Founders were correct.

Contrary to conservatives, high-effort thinking liberals embrace central planning government, class warfare, wealth redistribution, devaluing human life & unions. In short, today’s liberal is embracing Marxist principles.

If liberals would stop their high-effort thinking and study actual history (not Social Studies) they would discover that Marxism leads to communism. And communism doesn’t work. Ever.

Maybe our intrepid authors should swallow their liberal pride and re-think their papers thesis.

Another example of American Left trying to sway public opinion away from Second Amendment

Take it away Slow Joe Biden:

“The idea that there’s this overwhelming additional security in the ownership and carrying concealed and deadly weapons… I think it’s the premise, not the constitutional right, but the premise that it makes people safer is one that I’m not so sure of,” Biden said.

The Obama regime will use any excuse (or manufacture one… Fast and Furious) to try turning public opinion away from legal gun ownership.

The good news is, Americans aren’t buying what Obama / Biden / Holder et al. are selling.

Canada Eliminates Its Penny

Inflation has rendered the penny less than worthless (costing more to produce than it’s worth). Via Freakonomics:

If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you may know that I am devoutly anti-penny. This includes a rant on 60 Minutes in which I argue that the penny should be killed off, as inflation has rendered it worse than worthless.

The U.S. government remains unpersuaded, but our good neighbors to the north are about to take the leap (following the lead, it should be said, of several other countries).

If the United States follows Canada’s (and several other countries) lead and does away with the penny, the move will remind Americans how much the US government has inflated its currency over the last several decades.

Eliminating the penny would also signal the U.S. Government really has no plan for returning to a strong dollar policy any time soon.

Eco-Warriors are still pushing the stupidity known as Earth Hour

Greenies will not give up. Ever.

Even though global warming / cooling / climate change has been exposed for the fraud that it is, the eco-warriors continue marching forward toward their Marxist utopia.

One corporation caught up in the stupidity known as Earth Hour is Wells Fargo.

According to the Wells Fargo blog:

This is our fifth consecutive year as an Earth Hour supporter. We continue to champion the movement in the ways we’ve blogged about before, in both 2010 and 2011.

We’re particularly proud that our Earth Hour promotion appears on more than 12,000 of our ATMs nationwide from today through March 31, and that it will reach millions of our customers!

Its sad to see a historic company, a symbol of American progress and growth, succumb to the leftist, no growth ideology.

I mean, they wrote songs about Wells Fargo back in the day:

YouTube Preview Image

What will the sing about now? Sitting in the cold and dark to ‘save the entire planet?’