Columnist At The Financial Post Wants A Planetary Law Allowing One Child Per Couple
If you want to sum up all the nonsense at the Copenhagen Climate Conference in one word it would be “control.” The “Global Governance” crowd meeting in Copenhagen want control. They want to determine what you drive, how warm you keep your home and now, there is a call to limit how many children you can have. All this based on the hoax of global warming.
Via The Financial Post:
The “inconvenient truth” overhanging the UN’s Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.
A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.
The world’s other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity’s soaring reproduction rate.
President Obama’s “science czar,” John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would oversee human population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet
The world and certainly the United States is not even close to being overpopulated. If the entire population of the United States (just under 305 million people) were to move to the state of Texas (262,000 sq miles) it would result in a population density of 1,164 people / sq mi. Granted, the state would look like one giant suburb that is slightly less populous than Novi, Michigan (with a population density of 1,775 people / sq mi.) but the rest of the nation, from sea to shining sea, would be empty.
To look at this another way, according to the 1990 Census, the population density of New York City is 23,700 people /sq. mi.
The real problem facing the United States and Europe is the graying of our population, not over crowding.
The Population Paradox:
An intelligent, educated individual explains to his tribe that there are far too many human beings on the planet and that, by increasing our numbers, we risk our own safety and that of our children.
On hearing this information, the more intelligent, sensitive, caring listeners resolve to have fewer children.
On hearing the same information, the less intelligent, sensitive, caring listeners don’t change their behavior.
The result is fewer intelligent, sensitive, caring people in the next generation.
Yes, the Population Paradox really is as simple as that — to put it bluntly, people who care about the state of the planet are outcompeted by those who don’t.
Source: http://www.arachnoid.com/evolution/index.html
Answer: Let Liberals think that they are the “intelligent, sensitive, caring people” and just wait it out. WH
@Wayne Harropson: Good one Wayne!
Much like the conservation of mass theory (matter cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be rearranged), liberasl will cloak their desires in different causes (the environment, population control, social justice) but the core never changes. The desire of control over people.
But I do like the idea of “waiting them out.”
Thanks for the comment and please stop by again.